FOSDEM: more boring shit (2021/02/01)
Let's take a look at my annotated copy of the FOSDEM 2021 main talk schedule, shall we?
"Welcome" here of course meaning "use this twenty-five minutes to wait for the video conferencing software to start working."
Thank you for watching two straight days of Youtube videos that could have been blog posts. Look on the bright side -- at least you didn't get the benefit of postproduction!
It turns out that abstracting away all the hardware has negative consequences too! Since nobody could ever have seen this problem coming, it's taking years to iron out.
Speaker's name anagram: LAG. SHE WAITS.
Speaker affiliation: Red Hat (Business Model: "Uber for Support Fees")
You can't afford magical future computers, so you should definitely rent them from one of our extremely pleasant and attractive business partners. In order to feel like you're getting your money's worth, we'll even teach you how to look like you're using them!
Speaker's name anagram: PLAIN SHRUG
Speaker affiliation: Red Hat (Business Model: "Uber for Oracle Linux")
Remember OpenStack? What would it look like if someone started over, without drowning it in a bureaucratic peat bog? This person arrives to answer the question nobody asked.
Speaker's name anagram: CHILI MALLETS
Speaker affiliation: undisclosed
"You know what would really make MySQL pop," said someone on the internet, "is if we launched it with inetd. Well, not inetd, but something almost exactly like it but configured via Windows INI files."
Speakers' name anagram: K-LINED CABAL
Speaker affiliation: MariaDB (Business Model: "Uber for PHP ORMs")
Under no circumstances should you learn a single goddamn thing from decades of distributed systems research. Just do what Microsoft does, except with off-brand functional clones of their product line, because licenses are expensive.
Speaker's name anagrams: CALMER MONORAIL and PLAIN OLD IGLOO
Speaker affiliation: FUSS (Business Model: "Uber for Sharepoint")
Oh, let me try!
- Choose a text editor
- Choose a source code hosting site
- Use the text editor to create a file called LICENSE
- Use the text editor to fill your LICENSE file with an open source license
- Upload your program to the source code hosting site
Speaker's name anagrams: I SCAN BANJO and ZAPS ONTO JARS
Speaker affiliations: Percona (Business Model: "Uber for Inner Joins"), Red Hat (Business Model: "Uber for Freedesktop.org")
Joke redacted in accordance with the wishes of some German organization, who does not want me to show you any of the emails about this matter.
The Free Software Purity Squad has arrived to lecture us: it is not sufficient for source code to be freely given, no, the people who make it must bow to the Cult of Copyright! There is no indication the speaker intends to explain why all the examples of apostasy are database vendors who got their shit knocked over by better hosting providers.
Content warning: The speaker's profile page on FOSDEM contains graphical depictions of the inside of someone's mouth.
Speaker's name anagram: A KNOTTY VOMIT
Speaker affiliation: Percona (Business Model: "Uber for Outer Joins")
The obvious answer, "stop being an imposter," is presumably not what the speaker has in mind for this talk. Instead, I would guess we'll be treated to the golden oldies of the self-help genre: don't beat yourself up for mistakes, focus on positive feedback, and choose one of meditation, "mindfulness", journaling, or existentialism. Of course, none of those answers are correct. Only through flagellating yourself for every typographical error will you become a better typist. People who compliment you are either morons, enemy agents, or sales operatives. Meditation is for people who don't have shit to do. Mindfulness only takes conscious effort if you're not firing on all cylinders. Journals are only good for looking back in regret at the shit you failed to get done. And, of course, existentialism is a waste of time, since we're all just confused automatons programmed to serve God through His chosen medium, which is 64kb scene demos.
Speaker's name anagram: BEMOAN TUTOR
Speaker affiliation: "Kockava" (sic, probably Kochava?) (Business Model: "Uber for Mobile Popup Ads")
The speaker is under the impression that software development practices are democratic, that consensus algorithms are democratic, and that open-source software development practices are materially different from other software development practices. Presumably this will culminate in an explanation regarding why a group of software developers who felt left out stormed and occupied the primary management facility of the project.
Speaker's name anagram: JUMBO CARMINE
Speaker affiliation: EDB (Business Model: "Uber for Percona")
Just in time, X11 develops feature parity with Windows-98-era ActiveX.
Speaker's name anagram: BANISH MOJO KITS
Speaker's affiliation: undisclosed
The problem with governance, this speaker believes, is that there are not enough layers of abstraction. It's not sufficient to merely have a policy; that policy must be declarative, formatted in YAML, and fed into a Rube Goldberg device of a continuous-integration platform -- and of course, the longer the pipeline, the more transparent you are.
Speaker's name anagram: A LORDLY ZEALOT
Speaker affiliation: Hashicorp (Business Model: "Uber for CFEngine")
Finally, someone has worked out how to change the gentle waves of botnet traffic breaking upon the beachhead of your server into a visual white noise generator.
Speaker's name anagrams: NO BASIC, JAN and JAN TRAPS ZOOS
Speaker affiliations: Percona (Business Model: "Uber for EDB"), Red Hat (Business Model: "Uber for Tomcat")
Were they ever? Signs point to "no," but I guess we're just going to read feature lists and ramble about it for an hour! Bonus points if you figure out why this is in the 'performance' track.
Speakers' name anagram: HÄRK! BRAZEN NERD SNORER
Speaker affiliation: Huawei (Business Model: "Uber for Espionage")
In this groundbreaking talk, we're treated to a revolutionary idea: databases can perform faster when we run them on faster hardware. By the time the presentation concludes, the speaker will receive at least two phone calls regarding the impending award of the Gordon Bell Prize.
Speaker's name anagram: GAG ON Nᵀᴴ Z
Speaker affiliation: ScaleFlux (Business Model: "Uber for the Hardware Described In This Talk")
Settle in for an hour of man pages narrated out loud.
Speaker's name anagram: JOIN! SNATCH A FEZ!
Speaker affiliation: undisclosed (but it's Red Hat (Business Model: "Uber for QEMU"))
A dilettante ports Stone Soup to vaporware.
Speaker's name anagram: VENIAL ROMP
Speaker affiliation: undisclosed (but it's SUSE (Business Model: "Uber for Red Hat"))
Having successfully clawed its way back into Google's walled garden, IRC webshit du jour is here to explain their brilliant new plan: stop cloning Slack and start cloning Microsoft Teams instead. After all, the market has spoken!
Speaker's name anagram: DOTH HEW AMONGST
Speaker affiliation: Element (Business Model: "Uber for IRC")
Atlassian would like to remind you that there's at least one product line you haven't grown to irrationally hate over the past ten years, and invites you to spend the next ten years growing to irrationally hate it.
Speaker's name anagram: ACROBÁT REGÚLARISER
Speaker affiliation: undisclosed (but it's Atlassian (Business Model: "Uber for Sourceforge"))
Remember Second Life? This speaker does! Haven't you ever wished you could flush your effort directly into the toilet? Here we are provided with the next best thing -- the opportunity to learn the ins and outs of a Second Life clone. The talk description does not mention what will happen when every single server is besieged by griefers around the clock, forever.
Speaker's name anagram: AVIONIC DISK RYTHYMS
Speaker's affiliation: undisclosed
FOSDEM: more boring shit (2020/01/29)
Let's take a look at my annotated copy of the FOSDEM 2020 main talk schedule, shall we?
The speaker would like to ascribe credit to Linux for the invention of all of the groundbreaking features that Linux has poorly copied from better operating systems and then conclude that Andy Tanenbaum was right.
Speaker's name anagram: THEME: HE RUINS LOTS
We are not treated to a definition of "FOSSH," but we may presume that poorly-supported hardware has joined the ranks of poorly-supported software as a topic of this conference.
Speaker's name anagram: LOGJAM? OLD HAND
The FOSDEM organizers were unable to recruit a third keynote speaker willing to talk about anything interesting, so instead they tagged someone with twenty years' worth of nothing-better-to-do to rely on a nostalgia filter to make past conferences seem interesting in comparison.
Speaker's name anagram: VETOED OWN SIGN
Community and Ethics
Fifty entire minutes from a person who thinks that the copyright license matters at all when operating a city government. The people who write the software used by actual city governments will not be in attendance, because neither Excel nor Powerpoint are available under a free-software license.
Speaker's name anagram: PEON DOES CARE
The speaker attempts to resolve the cognitive dissonance inspired by the repeated claims of "protecting user freedoms" despite all open-source programmers being employed by massive software companies. No solutions are provided, but some advice is promised regarding the maintenance of license-cult affiliation while conning some webshit company into paying you to mismanage your hobby projects.
Speaker's name anagram: MOTLEY TAME JOBS
The speaker is convinced that some of the attendees might not have noticed the six hundred thousand articles from Buzzfeed, Gizmodo, Engadget, and Reader's Digest that personal surveillance furniture is not made with the owner's best interests in mind. This talk consists of @internetofshit's twitter feed on a five-year time delay.
Speaker's name anagram: CAN LOB MY DELL
Some ostensible programmers have decided they are the proper people to introduce ethics to the latest buzzword factory, based on close consultation with the largest privacy-violation apparatus ever constructed and a hodgepodge of B-team politicians-in-exile.
Speakers' name anagrams: I JUSTLY FROWN and HELL NO, MANIAC
Containers and Security
A Red Hat arrives to try to convince other middle managers that this container stuff is totally different and somehow relevant to that 5G thing you keep seeing in TV commercials. It is not different, and it is not relevant to any specific radio communications technology, but Red Hat's not paying for the talk to make sense. Red Hat is paying for the talk to convince ISP operators to buy Openshift licenses.
Speaker's name anagram: NERDLIKE AI
In this roller-coaster of a talk, the speaker will outline the crippling security failures of current IT-industry darling Kubernetes, then reassures us that these problems do have solutions, only to horrify us again by revealing the solutions start with "shitting arbitrary code into a Turing-complete interpreter in Ring 0."
Speaker's name anagram: N.K. SAVIOR
Some programmers think they can work around hardware information leaks in code.
Speakers' name anagrams: LAMEST BYTE MOJO and TAPROOM PIKER
The developer of a package manager nobody asked for, written in a programming language nobody likes, insists that the package manager is in fact a perfect replacement for whatever the hell you've been doing, regardless of what that is.
Speaker's name anagram: I COULD SCOUR TV
This talk, awkwardly shoved into the schedule at the last minute, sees the speaker claim that shitty fifty-cent on-device sensors are generating data faster than SQLite can store it. This is obviously horse shit, and the speaker hasn't actually got anything working yet, but the speaker needed some attention, which is the primary factor in whether one is allocated speaking time at FOSDEM.
Speaker's name anagram: SANE HARDER
A PostgreSQL consultant tries to drum up public support for a patchset nobody wanted.
Speaker's name anagram: ENJOY A COW
An Ubuntu gets on the "SQLite, but better" bandwagon. Unlike the previous project, which combined SQLite with some code derived from academia to solve perceived flaws in the wrong layer, this project takes the revolutionary approach of combining SQLite with some code derived from academia to solve perceived flaws in the wrong layer.
Speaker's name anagram: A FAKE ARENA KEY
An Oracle shows up to convince us their also-ran database product is still relevant. The only remaining users of the program in question are people running Movable Type, and those people are using the non-Oracle fork of the program anyway. Still, the speaker has to say something to justify Oracle's payment for the trip. As a result, this talk will consist of the speaker reading the MySQL changelog directly from the commit log.
Speaker's name anagram: LØGS VARY? I'D HIKE
While their government may have lost interest, some Russians are still interested in pretending to participate in Europe. The talk is about taking an academic paper from Cornell in 2002 and shoving it into the source code of a MongoDB clone.
Speaker's name anagram: VOILA! SLY VIPS HALVED.
A Google, a Facebook, and a Linux Foundation (a trade organization representing Google and Facebook) lecture us about how hard we must fight to keep their employers from destroying our access to computer software.
Speakers' name anagrams: SNAZZY? RICH? SICK. and SMALL SIX with HI, MEGA-CLENCH!
A bullshit peddler has a crystal ball, which would like us to know that all open-source programmers are wasting their time. Time is stressed in the talk description as being a precious resource, not to be squandered. It is greatly to be hoped that readers will heed this admonition and not waste any of their finite time listening to this jackass jabber for an hour.
Speaker's name anagram: LADY'S TOKEN FRIZZ
A bureaucrat would like greasy computer nerds to stop getting angry on the internet about Codes of Conduct, but is too much of a coward to just say that.
Speaker's name anagram: RETHINK RACISM HATS
OpenStack is a suite of computer management software which is most recently notable for having missed the boat and imploded at the same time. While the flaming wreckage slowly sinks into the ocean, one of the people responsible for the disaster would like us to know how important it is to support the class of software to which OpenStack belongs, even though anyone who is receptive to that message is already using Kubernetes.
Speaker's name anagram: RARER ICY HERTZ
As terrified programmers desperately try to squeeze every drop of value from the code they relentlessly shit into GitHub, some conclude that the obvious path to profit is copyright law. A bureaucrat arrives to declare that copyright law can be profitable, but not that way, and out of the thousands and thousands of companies on Earth, successfully names three adherents to the copyright cult which have achieved success. One is no longer an independent company, another has had five owners in the past ten years, and the other was founded as a direct result of the mismanagement of its predecessor, but I'm sure none of that will come up in the talk.
Speaker's name anagram: RANKER FLAK SHTICK
Another bureaucrat tries to convince us our tax money isn't being wasted. They're fucking around with blockchains (still!), so nobody will be convinced.
Speaker's name anagram: BACK ON DRAMA
Having failed to gain any traction in commercial telephony, Maemo is the natural place some programmers would turn when searching for a telephone interface to poorly copy. By combining bad clones of proprietary software, niche Linux distributions with no clear policies or mission, and vaporware hardware from a fly-by-night bad-computer vendor, you can have complete control of a telephone that doesn't exist, wouldn't boot if it did, and couldn't make phone calls if it booted. Rejoice, for your time is at hand.
Speakers' name anagrams: JEWEL, WARN MR. JIB! and ERR: BARB BITS
The fact that the talk description is beset with typesetting errors is so hilariously on-message for LibreOffice that I can make no further enhancements to the sense of derision this talk should inspire.
Speaker's name anagram: HECKLES A MIME
The speaker mysteriously refuses to specify what has been automated for twenty years, but cursory examination of the namedropped software product reveals the truth: yet another half-assed domain-specific language intended to abstract away those pesky computers. Only the speaker knows what systems administrators were doing prior to 1999 (hint: there has been an IEEE standard about it longer than that) and why it wasn't really automation -- much less why "reimplement everything from scratch in a fad language" became the right answer in 2015.
Speaker's name anagram: JAM IN BUSHES
A programmer made some software people use and would like you to sit through an origin story.
Speaker's name anagram: NEONATAL ODORS
This is the annual "FOSDEM organizers accidentally scheduled an interesting talk" talk, delivered by someone who has put actual effort into communicating information that is not self-aggrandizing or otherwise devoted to corporate marketing.
Speaker's name anagram: HER OWLS RAN
Another SUSE needed some business justification for the FOSDEM trip; this time it's a combination of "you're doing it wrong" and some mournful rehashing of failed also-rans from recent computing history.
Speaker's name anagram: PRIMEVAL NO
The author of curl, Daniel Stenberg, who wrote curl, is so excited to find a country he's allowed into that he takes a break from being the author of curl to tell us about a new version of HTTP, which addresses HTTP/2's "TCP over TCP" problem by migrating to a "TCP over TCP over UDP" model. By formalizing layer violations directly into the protocol, Google can remove any opportunity to interfere with advertising and surveillance, since the application (specified in the standards as Chrome) communicates directly to AdSense without leaking signs of important personal information exfiltration to hostile third parties, such as the user. Daniel Stenberg, author of curl, is the author of curl, which is written and maintained by Daniel Stenberg.
Speaker's name anagram: ABSENT IN LEDGER
Some people from the United States Navy's bestselling honeypot promise, as in previous years, new ways of attracting users who are not drug vendors, murder vendors, or furries. None of them will work.
Speaker's name anagram: I RAP UGLIER
Some academics arrive to tell us that (once again) they have Fixed the Internet, and (once again) it runs on top of the current actually-working internet, and (once again) if you sign up you can communicate with as many as twelve other computers.
Speakers' anagram names: OW! KAMIKAZE SLUTS and A ČASUÁL VIM KOOK
The busiest human being on Earth, responsible for mitigating the weekly-discovered security failures in Intel hardware, gets paid to fly to Europe and show us how to work around his employer's increasingly-broken products by writing more computer programs.
Speaker's anagram name: ADD A TWIST REV
Some academics have gone to a lot of effort to allow us to interfere with software whose source code we already have. Since there's no immediate use for this technology, and the speaker is somewhat bored, we're going to get a demo.
Speaker's anagram name: NEUTRAL PARANOIAS
Someone thinks anyone still cares about VR.
Speaker's name anagram: URBAN LOCK SIZES
Yet Another IRC Clone reports that they've successfully solved some of the problems they inflicted upon themselves.
Speaker's name anagram: DAMN GHETTO SHOW
FOSDEM: more boring shit (2019/01/30)
Let's take a look at my annotated copy of the FOSDEM 2019 main talk schedule, shall we?
The sign-in sheet for this session doubles as a census of people nobody wants to talk to.
Some bureaucrats make excuses for the conference attendees' hypocrisy. In place of productive information or actual technical content, the speakers will whine about which programs nobody's writing for free. The audience will take notes on Macbooks, iPads, and other Apple products.
A primordial webshit travels to a conference devoted to serving a specific copyright cult, and then holds a lecture about why the copyright cult is really important. Nobody in the room will learn anything new, and the speaker will not reach any audience not already in the cult. While this is arguably a massive failure of advocacy, it's also about on par with copyright cultists' track record to date.
Another bureaucrat speaks to a very specific confluence of misapprehensions, to wit:
- Any functioning human gives a shit about bitcoin,
- Bitcoin has any effect on human society at all,
- Anyone has found a valid use case for blockchain technology,
- Blockchain dunces are ever given any position of responsibility,
- Anyone cares about the ethical value judgments of a professional copyright cultist
Nobody attending the talk will have the heart to point any of this out.
The speaker is very angry that people are using computers in a manner that renders specific copyright licenses irrelevant. The audience will be instructed to care even harder, even though no solutions are available. The speaker works for a company whose profitability depends on a customer base who gives a shit about copyright licenses.
Jon Hall observes the 50th anniversary of the creation of UNIX, and generously includes Linux in the observance. Linux does not deserve this, and the FOSDEM audience does not deserve Jon Hall, but on the bright side this talk will ruin the "100% useless dipshittery" streak in this year's FOSDEM lineup. That's right: they can't even fuck things up correctly.
if they'd just started with this talk we'd all be spared a lot of noise
Why, you might ask, would "open source" layered extensibility be different from any other extensibility approach (layered or otherwise) in any other software? It would not, of course, but the CEO of the company needed a reason to fly to Brussels for the weekend, and this is as good a reason as any to write it off as a business expense. Spoiler alert: "layered extensibility" here is a code for "everything is webshit."
A webshit will try to convince the audience that replacing other protocols with webshit is healthy and good. "Why" will be answered with "because we want to track you more closely," "how" will be answered with "extremely poorly," "when" will be answered with "as soon as the Chrome team tells you to" and "who gets to control how names are resolved" will of course be "Google."
A corporate drone explains that using non-Linux operating system makes it easier to get your company's shitware committed upstream, spreading out the maintenance burden and magically converting some of your operating expenses into externalities you can ignore. Sorry, I mean "engaging with a close-knit developer community benefits your product's ROI."
A database management program has not yet ceased development. The speaker will read the version control commit log for one hour.
A Postgres will mumble about RAM management features that everyone has been using for approximately twenty years. This talk belongs at some kind of professional database symposium, but it's happening at FOSDEM, so the audience will consist entirely of the speaker's co-workers and the people who are going to use the room next.
Another Postgres regrets to inform us that they've been fucking up basic storage primitives for at least the entirety of the 21st century, and continue to fuck them up today. This talk will comprise an extended apology, followed by a lot of excuses and whining, wrapping up with wholly unsubstantiated claims regarding future improvements. The only people who care already know.
The programmer behind an also-ran database program will discuss the only interesting aspect of that program: someone else's algorithm. The program in question is a port from Java to C++ of a database management program so shitty that Facebook, who created it, almost immediately discontinued all use and development thereof and donated the software to the Office of Software Terminal Care, also known as the Apache Foundation. The speaker chooses to work on this disgraceful travesty full-time.
Some corporate programmers are released from the mines long enough to pretend anyone cares about the things they work on. The anxiety and excitement induced by being allowed out of the cave caused them to paste the talk description into the web form twice. Nobody noticed.
This talk is an hour-long sales pitch for the speaker's employer, which sells a product that other companies can use to provision TLS certificates and spyware updates to touchscreen refrigerators. In order to lure idiots into attending the sales talk, the speaker will point out that the license of the software conforms to the thematic goals of the conference.
This talk is from a VA Linux alum, which means the talk will almost certainly be a story about how the speaker spent way too much money on poorly-performing hardware, then made it worse by crowbarring a half-working Linux installation onto it, resulting in a very expensive disaster that works about a third of the time. This will be followed by an invitation to others to follow suit in purchasing and then ruining a hundred-thousand dollar car, leading to a brand-new interpretation of the well-worn phrase "malfunctioning Linux driver."
Some rando is excited because you can now check if err != nil on smaller processors than ever before. Like literally every other language, the entire project is just transpiling to llvm intermediate code and then letting the existing toolsets handle the rest, completely removing any advantage of using a specific programming language.
A bureaucrat will ramble incoherently about seeking life advice from copyright law cultists.
Some Googles will present propaganda in order to sell low-quality laptops, on the principle that they can sometimes be tricked into functioning like actual laptops. With any luck, this will give Adsense valuable insights into the behavior patterns of gullible idiots, which sounds like a pretty juicy demographic to advertise in front of.
The speaker would like anyone at all please to use software maintained by the speaker. To achieve this goal, the speaker will try to convince a bunch of random strangers to choose graphical design tools not on their suitability for a given task, but based on the copyright licenses under which they are available. This conference is ridiculous.
A Microsoft tries to convince everyone to install a shitload of .dll files onto their Linux systems in order to use expensive IDEs to produce the same shit everyone else already does. Along the way, the Microsoft will brag about tricking many rubes into working for free on corporate platform code.
The rich and lengthy tradition of the Free Software community making inferior copies of other, better-engineered systems continues, in this instance enabling underemployed nerds the world over to shout things at their computers. Shouting at computers while some shoddy software desperately attempts to parse and respond to this input is apparently preferable to using any of the well-supported existing input devices that come with every single computer on earth, so this talk will be well-attended and extremely beneficial to anyone who has nothing better to do on Sunday afternoon.
This talk, from a Facebook lawyer apparently being punished with public relations duty, has nothing to do with privacy at all. The entire point of the talk is to make the audience believe that Facebook gives a single shit about their opinions regarding intellectual property law. The actual product whose weaponized license caused a shitstorm in nerd circles is not mentioned even once: misdirection, or idiocy? That's a trick question; nobody can tell the difference.
An academic, enrolled in the Tim Berners-Lee fan club, will engage in a performance-art piece hypothesizing about a world where anyone gives a shit about what Tim Berners-Lee wants. In accordance with the colorful tradition of web-reinvention nutcases, bold claims and broad promises will rain down upon a rapt audience. After forty minutes, the speaker will ask for questions from the audience, who will respond by spending ten minutes' sober contemplation of profound questions like "what if we COULD do things better?," "I wonder what room I was supposed to have been in?," and "if I leave now, can I get something to eat before the next unhinged rant?"
The United States Defense Department's most successful honeypot sends its apex bureaucrat to reassure paranoid Europeans that they can still totally trust all this stuff, you guys. Everything's fine. We're on your side. Route all your traffic through us. It's for your own good.
A researcher would like the audience to consider what happens when government oppression is executed in a mode that allows blame to be shifted to ostensibly-unbiased computer programs, but the talk description suffered a transporter malfunction and was merged with every edition of Roget's Thesaurus of English Words and Phrases. Those audience members with a sufficiently enhanced vocabulary will have to undertake the task of translating the meaning of this talk into emoji for wider dissemination.
A search engine programmer will deliver a sales talk.
The audience for this talk, whose topic is low-level systems diagnosis, will consist entirely of webshits who are under the delusion that "distributed" means it uses http as a core protocol. None of them will understand it, but understanding is not required to paste the relevant keywords into the end of their resumes.
Because Kubernetes, a clustered-application execution platform, was invented by Google, there is no way to usefully inspect any aspect of it. The speaker is one of a large class of poor sods who have to resort to injecting code at runtime into the kernel to make up for the absense of fundamental operational functionality. The talk will be well-attended, because injecting code at runtime into the operating system kernel is simpler than debugging Kubernetes.
A programmer will attempt to Fix All The Problems with perl by reimplementing all of the other projects created to Fix All The Problems with perl. This talk was primarily scheduled to keep the room available for people who couldn't get into the ChromeOS talk in the other room.
A Red Hat drone thinks that the problem with local filesystems is they don't have enough of the network stack involved. This talk will explain how to rectify this omission, as well as some tips on how to make block storage as unreliable as everything else Red Hat pays to develop.
A FreeBSD developer thinks that five-year-olds are interested in why storage software caches things into RAM and how that cache is managed. The only five-year-olds the speaker has ever met are bugs in the software being discussed. The word 'works' in the talk title is to be interpreted as an aspiration. We can reevaluate things after the FreeBSD project deletes all this shit and gets in line behind the Linux weenies.
Another sales talk designed to turn this weekend into a business expense. No apologies to this software's victims are promised. The sales talk highlights using the software as an abstraction layer for AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Storage, without mentioning what a high-maintenance treadmill nightmare the solution is.
An OpenStack refugee disguises a CV as a talk, using numbers that seem large to attract an audience. Most of the performance of the namedropped system comes from add-on 'accelerator' cards which are so unusably terrible that Intel discontinued the entire product line out of shame. If the OpenStack project had any dignity, it would follow suit. The talk description does not contain a reason the speaker would admit in public being involved with any of this.